Adrian Vermeule Calls for Forceful Suppression, Dismisses 'Deeper Causes' of Violence

Cambridge, MA – Harvard Law School Professor Adrian Vermeule recently ignited discussion with a social media post advocating for the forceful suppression of violence without concern for its underlying origins. In a tweet, Vermeule stated, > "Incredible. Throughout history, civilization has been built on a willingness to forcefully suppress the violence of barbarians, without worrying about “deeper causes.”" The statement reflects a perspective that prioritizes immediate, decisive action against perceived threats.

Vermeule, a prominent legal scholar and a convert to Catholicism, is a leading proponent of Catholic integralism and "common-good constitutionalism." This legal and political philosophy posits that the state should be oriented toward a specific moral common good, often implying a subordination of temporal power to spiritual authority and a willingness for the state to enforce morality. This approach contrasts sharply with traditional liberal democratic principles that emphasize individual autonomy and rights.

His current stance echoes themes from his earlier academic work, particularly on executive power and national security. In books such as "Terror in the Balance" (2007) and "The Executive Unbound" (2010), co-authored with Eric Posner, Vermeule argued for robust executive authority and defended practices like "enhanced interrogation" in times of crisis. These past arguments align with his recent call for forceful suppression, suggesting a consistent belief in strong state intervention to maintain order.

Vermeule's integralist views and their implications have drawn significant criticism from various quarters, often labeled as illiberal and authoritarian. Critics express concerns that his vision could lead to a state that coerces citizens, restricts individual freedoms, and undermines religious tolerance, potentially prioritizing certain moral codes over pluralistic societal values. His proposed strategy of "strategic ralliement" involves integralists occupying administrative positions to steer state power towards their desired social order.

The Harvard professor's remarks contribute to an ongoing debate within conservative legal and intellectual circles regarding the future of liberalism, the scope of state power, and the role of moral authority in governance. His advocacy for a more assertive, less introspective approach to societal challenges continues to provoke discussion on the foundational principles of law and order.