A leading voice in artificial intelligence policy, Miles Brundage, has called for a crucial balance in the outputs of advanced AI models, seeking a "middle ground" between overly verbose, potentially erroneous responses and a lack of transparent reasoning. Brundage, who previously led policy research and AGI preparedness at OpenAI, articulated this perspective in a recent social media post, underscoring a significant challenge in the evolving AI landscape.
"There should probably be some middle ground between TMI/probably hallucinated chain of thought summaries constantly from the ChatGPT interface, on the one hand, and literally nothing from Deep Think," Brundage stated in his tweet. This observation points to the dual challenge faced by Large Language Models (LLMs): the tendency to generate extensive, sometimes factually incorrect "chain-of-thought" explanations, and the opaque nature of highly capable models.
The "TMI/probably hallucinated chain of thought summaries" refers to a common issue where LLMs, while capable of step-by-step reasoning, can produce verbose outputs that include fabricated or logically flawed information, known as "hallucinations." This verbosity and potential for inaccuracy can undermine user trust and limit the practical utility of AI systems in critical applications.
Conversely, "Deep Think" appears to allude to the sophisticated, often less transparent, reasoning processes of advanced models like DeepSeek's R1 or OpenAI's o1. These models demonstrate powerful problem-solving abilities, but their internal workings or the concise nature of their direct outputs may offer "literally nothing" in terms of clear, interpretable insight into how they arrived at a conclusion. Brundage's background at OpenAI positions him uniquely to comment on the internal mechanics and public perception of such frontier models.
Brundage's advocacy for a "middle ground" highlights the urgent need for AI development to prioritize both raw capability and user comprehension. Achieving this balance means fostering AI systems that are not only intelligent and efficient but also reliable, transparent, and capable of providing explanations that are both accurate and appropriately concise. This shift is vital for building greater trust and facilitating the responsible integration of AI technologies across diverse sectors.