Population geneticist and commentator Razib Khan recently highlighted what he perceives as identitarian undercurrents across various political ideologies. In a social media post, Khan observed that a focus on group identity and interests, which he terms "identitarian," manifests in seemingly disparate political arguments. His commentary draws attention to how different factions prioritize the collective well-being and distinctiveness of specific groups.
Khan specifically cited instances where "parts of the left start arguing for immigration policies to 'diversify America' and weaken white supremacy," labeling this approach as identitarian. Critics of such left-wing arguments often contend that framing demographic change as a tool to shift power dynamics, even if aimed at combating historical injustices, can inadvertently reinforce group divisions. This perspective suggests that advocating for specific demographic outcomes based on group identity aligns with an identitarian framework.
He further extended this observation to national conservatism, noting that when "some natcons talk about 'but is it good for heritage Americans?' that's identitarian." National conservative movements frequently emphasize national identity, tradition, and the preservation of a nation's cultural and historical distinctiveness. Analysts suggest that this focus on the perceived foundational or "heritage" population's interests, when prioritized over universal principles, can be seen as a form of identitarian politics.
Khan concluded his observation by stating, "similarly with jewish ethnic politics." Discussions surrounding Jewish ethnic politics often revolve around ensuring the survival, security, and flourishing of the Jewish people, both in the diaspora and in Israel. When these political actions are primarily driven by and centered on the unique interests and identity of the Jewish group, observers frequently characterize them as a form of identitarianism, akin to how other ethnic groups engage in identity-based political action.
Razib Khan, known for his work on population genetics, history, and social issues through his Substack "Unsupervised Learning," frequently explores the complexities of ethnic identity and cultural shifts. His commentary underscores a broader interpretation of identitarianism as a political orientation that places group identity and its interests at the forefront of policy considerations, irrespective of the specific group or political alignment. This perspective invites a re-examination of how identity shapes political discourse across the spectrum.