Washington D.C. – The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recently announced a significant policy shift, clarifying its regulatory stance on certain training ammunition and easing import restrictions. This development, outlined in ATF Ruling 2025-2, addresses the complex definitions of "ammunition" under federal law, a topic that frequently sparks public debate and, at times, misinterpretations of the agency's mandate. Social media user Alice reflected this sentiment by stating, > "Unfair to the ATF. Not one of those letters stands for CARTRIDGES," highlighting a common public perception regarding the agency's name and its broad responsibilities.
Effective June 23, 2025, the ruling specifically removes previous restrictions on the importation of non-lethal marking rounds, also known as "simunition rounds." These specialized cartridges are designed for realistic force-on-force training, containing components similar to standard ammunition but engineered to fire exclusively in modified firearms or dedicated training devices. The ATF expects this change to reduce administrative burdens and enhance the accessibility of realistic firearms training nationwide.
The agency's decision is rooted in a detailed interpretation of the Gun Control Act (GCA) and the Arms Export Control Act (AECA), asserting that these training rounds do not meet the statutory definition of "ammunition." According to the ruling, the critical factor is whether the rounds are "designed for use in any firearm" intended for offensive or defensive combat. The ATF, referencing a recent Supreme Court decision, determined that the devices firing these training rounds are not "weapons" in the legal sense, thereby exempting the specialized rounds from traditional ammunition regulations.
Notably, the ruling explicitly distinguishes these training rounds from "less-than-lethal ammunition," such as rubber or plastic projectiles used for riot control, which generally remain classified as ammunition. For importers, this means qualifying training rounds can now be brought into the United States without the previously required ATF Form 6 application and permit. This regulatory update aims to streamline operations for the firearms industry, particularly for civilian training programs utilizing non-lethal simulation tools, while maintaining strict controls over conventional ammunition.
The intricate legal distinctions highlighted by ATF Ruling 2025-2 contrast with the simpler public critiques often seen, such as Alice's tweet. Such comments underscore a broader public conversation about the ATF's role, which, despite its name, has long encompassed the regulation of firearms and their components, including various forms of ammunition, based on their design and intended use under federal statutes.