Candace Owens Faces Scrutiny Amid Claims of French Involvement in Charlie Kirk's Assassination

Conservative commentator Candace Owens is facing renewed scrutiny and a recent lawsuit following her unsubstantiated claims regarding the September 10, 2025, assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk. Owens has publicly alleged French involvement in Kirk's death, a narrative that has drawn criticism for its speculative nature and timing. These claims come as a social media user accused an unnamed "grifter" of exploiting Kirk's death to further "twisted narratives."

Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot while addressing an audience at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. Authorities arrested 22-year-old Tyler James Robinson, who has since been charged with aggravated murder, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty. Investigators indicated Robinson's motive was politically driven, stemming from Kirk's views on LGBTQ+ rights.

A tweet from Frank McCormick highlighted the perceived exploitation of Kirk's death, stating, "In her entire history on this app, this grifter mentioned Charlie Kirk twice before he was murdered- both attacks. Since his death? SIXTY posts." McCormick further criticized the individual for dropping the "Charlie's a Christian Zionist!" act and instead "exploiting his name to fuel Candace Owens’ twisted narrative."

Owens recently announced a temporary halt to her show, claiming French President Emmanuel Macron attempted to orchestrate her assassination, a report she states the White House and counterterrorism agencies have acknowledged. She further asserted her belief that the Macrons "were involved in Charlie Kirk’s assassination, but they did not act alone." These allegations are part of a broader pattern of controversial statements, including a lawsuit from the Macrons over Owens' repeated, unverified claims about Brigitte Macron's gender identity.

The aftermath of Kirk's assassination has been marked by intense political polarization and a proliferation of misinformation. Owens' assertions contribute to an already charged environment where public figures on both sides have been accused of leveraging the tragedy for political gain. The legal action taken by the Macrons against Owens underscores the serious implications of such public accusations.