Chris Arnade Warns: Dense Cities Require 'Zero Tolerance for Disorder' to Avoid Becoming 'Fetid and Dangerous'

Urban observer and author Chris Arnade recently articulated a strong stance on the prerequisites for successful "walkable dense cities," asserting that their viability hinges entirely on a foundation of social trust and stringent public order. In a widely discussed tweet, Arnade contended that such urban environments function "when, and only when, people trust each other and don't mind living close together and sharing stuff, like subways and buses." He emphasized that this societal cohesion "only happens if you punish, lock up, and remove the bad actors."

Arnade, known for his "walking the world" project documenting urban life, argues that without prioritizing public safety, the benefits of density dissolve. He stated, "You can't have your abundance unless you put at the very top of the policy pyramid zero tolerance for disorder." His perspective suggests that the failure to maintain a high-trust environment through strict enforcement leads to undesirable outcomes, warning that otherwise, "your dense cities means fetid dangerous cities that few want to live in, other than the super rich who can buy private security."

The concept of walkable, dense, and mixed-use cities is widely promoted for numerous benefits, including reduced carbon emissions, improved public health through increased physical activity, and enhanced economic vitality. These urban designs foster community interaction and reduce reliance on private vehicles, leading to more sustainable and vibrant living spaces. Advocates often highlight the convenience and quality of life offered by neighborhoods where amenities are easily accessible on foot.

However, Arnade's commentary introduces a critical caveat to this ideal. He posits that the celebrated advantages of urban density are contingent upon a societal contract of mutual trust and adherence to order. His argument implies that policy discussions around urban planning must move beyond mere infrastructure and zoning to address the fundamental social dynamics that dictate a city's livability. This aligns with broader concerns that a breakdown in public order can undermine urban regeneration efforts and deter residents and businesses.

Arnade's views underscore a tension between the aspirational goals of modern urbanism and the practical realities of maintaining social harmony and safety. His insistence on "zero tolerance for disorder" as a foundational policy pillar challenges conventional approaches, suggesting that the success of dense urban living ultimately rests on the collective commitment to a secure and orderly environment.