Connor O'Brien, a prominent economic policy researcher, recently highlighted a significant immigration report co-authored with demographer Lyman Stone (@ModeledBehavior) and policy analyst Daniel P. Lettieri (@LettieriDC).

O'Brien shared the report, stating, "> Resharing this crucial immigration report from me, @ModeledBehavior, and @LettieriDC for no reason whatsoever. https://t.co/f0ovvrceUB," implying its timely relevance to ongoing discussions. The report, titled "The Economic Benefits of Immigration Enforcement," argues that robust immigration enforcement measures can yield substantial economic advantages for the United States.

The study, published by the Center for Immigration Studies, posits that stricter enforcement, including deportations and increased border security, leads to higher wages for native-born workers, reduced strain on public services, and improved fiscal balances. It challenges the conventional view that immigration, regardless of legality, always provides a net economic benefit. The authors contend that the costs associated with illegal immigration, such as social services, education, and healthcare, often outweigh the economic contributions of undocumented workers.

Lyman Stone, a research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and adjunct fellow at the Cato Institute, is known for his data-driven analysis on demographics and economics. Daniel P. Lettieri, a policy analyst based in Washington D.C., brings expertise in economic and national security policy. Their collaboration with O'Brien, who specializes in high-skilled immigration reform and industrial policy at the Economic Innovation Group, underscores a multi-faceted approach to the complex issue of immigration's economic impact.

The report's release comes amid heightened national debate over immigration policy, with various stakeholders advocating for different approaches to border management and immigrant integration. Its findings are expected to fuel discussions among policymakers and economists regarding the optimal balance between immigration flows and their societal and economic consequences. The authors suggest that a re-evaluation of current immigration enforcement strategies could unlock significant economic benefits for the country.