Conservative Commentator Darrell B. Harrison Labels "Gender" a "Biological Myth" in Recent Tweet

Conservative commentator and podcaster Darrell B. Harrison recently sparked discussion with a tweet on October 24, 2025, asserting that "Gender," a biological myth, is what led to this preposterous decision. While the specific "preposterous decision" referenced in his post remains undefined, Harrison's statement underscores a prominent viewpoint in the ongoing societal debate surrounding biological sex versus gender identity.

Harrison, known for his influential "Just Thinking" podcast and his role as Dean of Social Media at Grace to You, frequently addresses cultural and social issues through a conservative Christian lens. His public commentary consistently emphasizes a biblical worldview, often engaging with topics related to identity, ethics, and societal norms. He is a fellow of the Black Theology and Leadership Institute at Princeton Theological Seminary and a respected voice in cultural apologetics.

His tweet aligns with a conservative perspective that often distinguishes between biological sex, viewed as immutable and determined by anatomy, and gender, which is often considered a social construct. This viewpoint frequently argues against the idea of gender existing independently of biological sex, especially when it influences public policy or institutional decisions. Such discussions often highlight traditional definitions and roles.

The debate over the definition and implications of "gender" is a recurring theme in public discourse, impacting various sectors from education to international policy. For instance, recent reports from the Bonn Climate Talks in August 2025 indicated a debate where some nations, including Argentina, advocated for narrowing the concept of 'gender' to strictly 'two sexes, male and female' in official documents. This highlights the global nature and contentious aspects of the terminology.

Harrison's statement reflects a broader sentiment among those who believe that modern interpretations of gender identity contradict fundamental biological realities and lead to what they perceive as problematic outcomes. His use of strong language like "biological myth" and "preposterous decision" signals a firm stance against policies or cultural shifts that he views as departing from a sex-based understanding of human identity.