On August 1, 2025, writer Katya Sedgwick made a public statement via tweet addressing speculation about Tucker Carlson's religious conversion and asserting a surprising religious demographic within the "groyper" movement. Sedgwick stated, > "I doubt Tucker converted to Islam, but many groyper faithful are Muslim and many more will eventually “revert”." This declaration from the writer, known for her contributions to conservative media, has drawn attention to the complex and often contradictory nature of affiliations within certain far-right circles.
Tucker Carlson, a highly influential conservative media personality, has a well-documented history of expressing critical and often Islamophobic views. His past commentary, widely reported across various media outlets, has included discussions of an "Islamic problem" and characterizations of the religion as a threat to Western societies. These long-standing public positions make any rumors of his conversion to Islam highly improbable and inconsistent with his established rhetoric.
Conversely, the "groyper" movement, led by figures such as Nick Fuentes, is broadly characterized by white nationalist, antisemitic, and anti-immigrant ideologies, often exhibiting overt hostility towards Islam. Organizations that monitor extremist groups consistently describe Groypers as a far-right network that actively promotes anti-Islamic narratives. Their documented stance typically opposes the presence and influence of Islam in Western societies, directly contradicting Sedgwick's assertion of a significant Muslim following within their ranks.
Katya Sedgwick, a writer based in the San Francisco Bay Area, has contributed to prominent conservative publications including The American Conservative and The Federalist. Her work frequently delves into conservative viewpoints and cultural commentary. Her use of the term "revert" in the tweet, which is commonly used in some Islamic contexts to describe conversion, suggests a specific understanding of religious transformation.
The notable discrepancy between Sedgwick's claim and the widely documented anti-Islam nature of the groyper movement highlights potential internal dynamics or attempts to reshape the movement's public image. This unusual assertion could reflect an effort to bridge disparate ideological groups or a misinterpretation of the movement's core tenets. The statement invites further scrutiny into the complex and often contradictory elements present within contemporary right-wing political landscapes.