Controversial Cabinet Selections Spark Widespread Criticism in New Trump Administration

Public health expert Eric Feigl-Ding recently declared on social media, "Shocker—Nobody likes Trump’s cabinet," reflecting a wave of intense scrutiny and opposition surrounding the initial appointments and actions of a new Donald Trump administration. The tweet, posted on September 18, 2025, highlights the deeply polarized reception to a cabinet largely characterized by controversial figures and policies.

The selections for key positions have drawn sharp criticism from various sectors, with nominees such as Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Secretary of Health and Human Services facing significant backlash. Critics, including former senior adviser to President Bill Clinton, Sidney Blumenthal, have described these appointments as "agents of his contempt, rage and vengeance," suggesting a deliberate strategy to dismantle existing government structures.

Among the most contentious picks, Matt Gaetz's nomination for Attorney General has raised concerns due to past controversies and ongoing ethical inquiries. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., tapped for Health and Human Services, has been widely criticized for his anti-vaccine stances and promotion of conspiracy theories, prompting his cousin Caroline Kennedy to warn senators about him, calling him a "predator."

Other notable appointments include Fox News host Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a "Department of Government Efficiency," and Senator Marco Rubio as Secretary of State. These choices are seen by many as reflecting a desire to challenge established norms and implement radical changes across federal agencies, often prioritizing loyalty and a shared anti-establishment sentiment.

Early actions of the new administration, detailed in January 2025 reports, have included a sweeping freeze on federal loans and grants, which caused significant disruptions to programs funding schools, housing, and healthcare. The Smithsonian Institution also announced the closure of its diversity office, aligning with the administration's stance against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which it has labeled "illegal and immoral discrimination programs." State attorneys general have prepared lawsuits against the federal funding pause, with many states reporting frozen Medicaid reimbursement systems.