Conservative filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza recently took to social media to promote his 2016 film, "Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party," citing a "potential indictment looming for Hillary" Clinton. The tweet, posted by D'Souza on August 3, 2025, asserted the film's continued relevance in exposing what he described as a "corrupt, evil woman" and the "secret history of the Democratic Party."
"With a potential indictment looming for Hillary, I invite you to watch my 2016 film 'Hillary’s America.' It’s relevant now because it exposes this corrupt, evil woman, and also reveals the secret history of the Democratic Party," D'Souza stated in his tweet.
"Hillary's America," co-directed by D'Souza, was released during the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign and positioned as a critical examination of Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party's historical actions. The film, however, was widely panned by critics, with many describing it as partisan propaganda and poorly constructed, often focusing on conspiracy theories rather than factual historical analysis. Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reported a 4% approval rating for the film among critics.
Despite D'Souza's assertion, no confirmed indictment of Hillary Clinton has been announced by reputable legal or news sources as of August 2025. Recent discussions and declassifications of documents have indeed reignited conversations around past investigations, such as her use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State and allegations related to the 2016 Trump-Russia narrative. However, these ongoing developments primarily involve the release of information related to previous probes, rather than new charges or a confirmed indictment.
The claim of an impending indictment for Hillary Clinton has been a recurring theme in conservative media and political discourse for several years, often resurfacing in connection with declassified intelligence or renewed scrutiny of past events. D'Souza's promotion of his film appears to leverage this persistent narrative, encouraging his audience to revisit his work in light of the renewed political attention on Clinton's past.