A recent clarification from Politico's senior legal affairs reporter, Kyle Cheney, has addressed prevailing misrepresentations regarding federal law enforcement's role during the January 6, 2021, Capitol events. Cheney stated, "> This story is being wildly misrepresented — these were not undercover agents embedded in the crowd. They were part of the multi-agency law enforcement response after the Capitol was attacked, as the documents themselves make clear." This statement aims to distinguish between claims of federal instigation and a reactive law enforcement presence.
A December 2024 report by the Department of Justice Office of Inspector General (DOJ OIG) supports Cheney's assertion, explicitly finding no evidence that the FBI had undercover employees in the protest crowds or at the Capitol on January 6th. The OIG report further clarified that while 26 FBI confidential human sources (informants) were present in Washington D.C. that day, none were authorized by the FBI to enter restricted areas, break the law, or encourage illegal acts. This directly refutes theories of federal agents instigating the violence.
More recently, reports from September 2025, including those by The Blaze and Yahoo News, citing a senior congressional source, indicated the FBI informed Congress it had 275 plainclothes agents in the Jan. 6 crowds. This new information, however, does not necessarily contradict the OIG's findings. Plainclothes agents typically perform surveillance or security roles, distinct from undercover agents whose objective might involve active participation or instigation, which the OIG report specifically debunked.
The law enforcement response on January 6th was a complex, multi-agency effort that significantly escalated following the Capitol's breach. Initial security was managed by the Capitol Police and D.C. Metropolitan Police, with the National Guard's deployment facing delays. Reinforcements from various agencies arrived throughout the afternoon to secure the building and protect members of Congress, aligning with Cheney's emphasis on a response after the attack.
This distinction between various types of agents and their authorized roles, clarified by official reports and journalistic analysis, is crucial for an objective assessment of the day's security operations. The OIG report's definitive findings aim to provide a more accurate understanding of the federal law enforcement presence and actions during the tumultuous events of January 6th.