Don Winslow Warns of 'Watergate Style' Legal Risks in Reported Trump Consideration

Author Don Winslow recently issued a strong warning regarding a hypothetical action reportedly being considered by Donald Trump, asserting it would be "very stupid" and carry "far, far reaching implications." Winslow, a prominent critic of the former President, suggested the action could lead to the President "possibly breaking the law Watergate style." His comments, shared on social media, underscore ongoing concerns among some observers about the boundaries of presidential power.

Winslow's criticism draws a parallel to past instances where Trump's actions have, in his view, backfired. > "It will backfire - like his actions against @jimmykimmel did," Winslow stated, referencing the long-standing public disagreements between Trump and late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. Historically, Trump's public attacks on Kimmel have often inadvertently amplified Kimmel's platform and criticisms rather than silencing them.

The comparison to "Watergate style" actions invokes one of the most significant political scandals in U.S. history. The Watergate scandal, which led to President Richard Nixon's resignation, involved abuse of power, obstruction of justice, and attempts to use federal agencies for political retaliation. Winslow's use of this phrase highlights potential concerns about similar abuses of authority or legal transgressions.

Throughout his presidency and post-presidency, Donald Trump has faced numerous legal challenges and investigations concerning his decisions and the scope of presidential power. These inquiries have often sparked debates over constitutional limits and accountability. Winslow, known for his vocal critiques of Trump through social media campaigns and viral videos, frequently focuses on what he perceives as threats to democracy and the rule of law.

The author's warning suggests that any such reported consideration by Trump would not only be politically ill-advised but could also venture into legally perilous territory. Winslow's statement reflects a broader sentiment among some critics who remain vigilant about potential executive overreach and its consequences. The implications of such an action, as outlined by Winslow, could extend to significant legal and political ramifications.