Washington D.C. – Prominent journalist and co-founder of Vox, Matthew Yglesias, has sparked discussion with a recent social media post suggesting that dorm-style accommodations with communal cafeterias could offer a viable solution to the escalating costs of cooking at home versus using food delivery services like DoorDash. Yglesias posited that many young adults might embrace such living arrangements if legal and available, particularly those in their twenties.
The tweet addresses a growing debate concerning the perceived expense of home cooking compared to the convenience of food delivery. Delivery apps frequently include hidden fees, service charges, and restaurant markups, often making orders significantly more costly than direct restaurant purchases or preparing meals at home. Despite these added costs, the convenience factor often outweighs the financial burden for many consumers.
Yglesias, known for his extensive work on economics, politics, and housing policy, has consistently advocated for innovative approaches to urban living and affordability. His past work, including his book "The Rent Is Too Damn High," underscores his belief that increasing housing supply and exploring alternative living models are crucial for addressing contemporary economic challenges. His suggestion aligns with his broader "Yes In My Backyard" (YIMBY) philosophy, which promotes building more housing to reduce costs.
The concept of adult dorms or co-living spaces is not entirely new, with various models emerging in high-cost urban centers. These arrangements typically feature smaller private living units complemented by shared amenities such as co-working spaces, lounges, and communal kitchens. Proponents argue that such setups offer affordability and foster a sense of community, echoing historical single-room occupancy (SRO) models.
While communal living offers potential benefits like reduced housing and food expenses, challenges include privacy concerns, regulatory hurdles, and public perception. However, the idea of integrated dining facilities, akin to college cafeterias, could significantly reduce individual food preparation costs and time, providing a structured and potentially more affordable alternative to both expensive takeout and the demands of home cooking.
Matthew Yglesias's proposal highlights a pressing need for creative solutions to urban affordability, suggesting that a return to certain communal living aspects, particularly with integrated dining, could alleviate financial pressures for a segment of the population.