Educator Dismissed Amidst Online Backlash Over Charlie Kirk Death Comments

Murfreesboro, TN – An assistant dean at Middle Tennessee State University has been dismissed following online targeting by right-wing activists for remarks made concerning the death of prominent conservative figure Charlie Kirk. The incident highlights a growing trend of educators and public figures facing severe professional repercussions for expressing critical opinions on controversial topics on social media.

The dismissal came after the assistant dean reportedly posted, "Looks like ol’ Charlie spoke his fate into existence," a comment that quickly drew the attention of online activists. This sentiment was echoed in a social media post by user Rothmus 🏴, who stated, "They banned him from teaching for life because he said something that is true." The tweet, referencing a broader context of such actions, underscored the perceived injustice by some observers.

The targeting of individuals, including teachers and other workers, for their online comments about Kirk's death has been spearheaded by right-wing activist Chaya Raichik, known for operating the "Libs of TikTok" account. Raichik's campaign involves sharing names, photos, and workplace details of those who expressed little sympathy or made critical remarks, leading to swift disciplinary action from some institutions.

This wave of dismissals and investigations stems from a contentious online environment following Kirk's passing, where critical comments were often met with intense public pressure campaigns. While some online users celebrated or joked about Kirk's death, others, as reported by Reuters, offered criticisms of the far-right figure while explicitly denouncing violence.

The events at Middle Tennessee State University and elsewhere underscore a contentious debate regarding the boundaries of free speech for educators and public employees, particularly when their personal opinions intersect with their professional roles and attract organized online scrutiny. Institutions are increasingly navigating the complexities of protecting academic freedom versus responding to public outrage and activist pressure.