On December 5, 2025, the precarious political stability of the U.S. House of Representatives was again brought into sharp focus following a social media post highlighting the potential vulnerability of Speaker Mike Johnson. The Lincoln Project stated on X, formerly Twitter, that "> 9 House Republicans could choose to take away Johnson’s gavel today if they wanted," underscoring the narrow margin of control within the chamber. This assertion points to the ongoing fragility of the Speaker's leadership, a recurring theme in the current Congress.
The possibility of a motion to vacate the chair has consistently shadowed Speaker Johnson's tenure, echoing the circumstances that led to the unprecedented removal of his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy. Earlier in his speakership, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene notably filed a motion to vacate, though it was not immediately brought to a vote. Such actions highlight deep ideological divisions within the Republican caucus and the constant pressure on the Speaker to satisfy various factions.
Under House rules, any single member can introduce a motion to vacate the chair, which then requires a simple majority vote to pass. Given the razor-thin Republican majority, which typically holds around 218-220 seats, the defection of just a handful of members, such as the nine mentioned, could be decisive. If even a small number of Republicans were to vote with the Democratic minority, the Speaker's position would be immediately jeopardized.
The current political landscape in the House is characterized by this slim Republican majority, making it inherently challenging for any Speaker to unite the caucus on contentious issues. This environment empowers small groups of members to exert outsized influence, often threatening leadership positions to advance their legislative priorities or express dissent. The persistent threat of a motion to vacate can complicate legislative efforts and foster an atmosphere of perpetual political maneuvering.
The Lincoln Project, a prominent anti-Trump Republican group, frequently critiques the conservative wing of the Republican party and its leadership. Their statement underscores the ongoing internal strife that could potentially destabilize House leadership. The ability of a small number of Republicans to remove the Speaker reflects a broader trend of internal party challenges that have defined recent congressional sessions, with significant implications for the legislative agenda and overall governance.