Conservative commentator Stephen L. Miller recently suggested that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are unlikely to discontinue wearing face masks, even as broader federal mask mandates have largely been relaxed. In a social media post, Miller stated, > "I don't think ICE agents are going to be removing their masks now." This observation comes as federal agencies navigate a landscape of evolving public health guidelines and ongoing debates surrounding agent identification and operational security. By late 2024 and into 2025, most widespread federal mask mandates, initially implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, have been either lifted or significantly scaled back. Agencies now typically defer to localized health guidance or internal risk assessments, allowing for greater discretion regarding mask use in many public-facing roles. However, specific operational environments, such as detention facilities or high-risk enforcement actions, may still necessitate or encourage the use of personal protective equipment. Stephen L. Miller, known for his critical commentary on government policy and immigration issues, often employs a skeptical tone in his observations. His remark implies that factors beyond general public health mandates might be influencing mask-wearing practices within ICE. This could stem from a combination of continued health precautions in certain scenarios, operational security considerations, or a desire for anonymity during sensitive enforcement activities. The issue of agent identification has been a recurring point of contention, particularly concerning ICE operations. Critics advocate for greater transparency, requesting agents clearly display identification during public interactions. While ICE maintains that agent safety and operational security are paramount, the use of masks, whether for health or other reasons, can inadvertently contribute to concerns over accountability and transparency. As federal agencies continue to adapt to post-pandemic norms, the decision regarding mask usage for law enforcement personnel like ICE agents remains complex. It balances public health recommendations, operational necessities, and ongoing discussions about transparency and public trust. Miller's commentary highlights a perception that for ICE, masks may serve purposes that extend beyond simple health directives, reflecting the unique and often scrutinized nature of their work.