Medical researcher Kevin Bass, PhD, MS, recently ignited debate on social media by unequivocally stating, "Wokism isn't a religion metaphorically. It is a pagan religion, literally." The direct assertion from Bass, known for his outspoken views on various societal and scientific topics, adds to the ongoing public discourse surrounding the nature and characteristics of "wokism" or "wokeness."
Kevin Bass is an MD/PhD student who has gained a public profile for his critical commentary, particularly regarding public health responses to COVID-19 and shifts in political ideology. His social media presence often features strong opinions, and he has previously shared experiences of being dismissed from medical school, which he attributes to his truth-telling. Bass's latest statement reflects a growing sentiment among some commentators who view contemporary social justice movements through a religious lens.
The characterization of "wokism" as a religion, or having religious qualities, has been explored by various academics and public intellectuals. Figures like John McWhorter, a Columbia University linguist, and French philosopher Jean-François Braunstein have argued that "wokeness" exhibits features akin to a belief system, including sacred texts, dogmas, rituals, and a focus on concepts like original sin and redemption, albeit in a secular context. These analyses often point to a lack of forgiveness and an emphasis on purity within certain "woke" ideologies.
Conversely, others argue that labeling "wokism" as a religion is an oversimplification or a rhetorical tactic. Critics of this analogy suggest it can obscure the genuine social and political concerns that drive these movements, reducing complex issues to mere faith-based adherence. They contend that while some behaviors might appear zealous, they do not inherently constitute a religious framework, lacking supernatural elements or traditional theological underpinnings.
The assertion by individuals like Bass underscores a broader cultural struggle over language, values, and the interpretation of social phenomena. The debate extends beyond mere semantics, touching upon issues of free speech, academic freedom, and the perceived influence of identity politics in various institutions. As public figures continue to engage with and define these terms, the discourse surrounding "wokism" remains a significant aspect of contemporary cultural and political commentary.