A recent social media post by user (((Matthew Lewis))) has sharply criticized the authors of an unspecified publication, alleging their ties to Koch-funded climate science denial efforts from the early 2000s. The tweet stated, > "The list of authors of this piece are, quite literally, a who's-who of the most famous, Koch-funded climate science deniers from the early 2000's." It further asserted that "Federal climate policy is as dead as our Constitutional republic under traitorous Confederate Republican rule," highlighting a perceived paralysis in U.S. climate action.
Research and reports from various organizations, including Greenpeace and the Union of Concerned Scientists, indicate that Koch-controlled foundations have funneled significant sums to groups and individuals promoting climate science skepticism. Between 1997 and 2018 alone, Koch family foundations reportedly donated over $145 million to a network of nearly 90 think tanks and advocacy groups. This extensive funding effort has aimed to disparage climate science and actively block policy initiatives designed to address climate change.
Among the entities and individuals identified as recipients of Koch funding in the early 2000s and beyond are the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), the Heartland Institute, and researchers like Willie Soon. These organizations and figures have consistently published material questioning the scientific consensus on climate change, often presenting alternative viewpoints. The funding has been instrumental in creating an organizational backbone for the climate denial movement, as noted by observers.
The strategic investment by the Koch network has had a tangible impact on the American political landscape and climate policy development. Through lobbying efforts, advocacy campaigns, and the promotion of anti-regulatory stances, the network has played a significant role in obstructing climate legislation. Initiatives such as Americans for Prosperity's "No Climate Tax" pledge have successfully influenced lawmakers, contributing to a legislative environment resistant to comprehensive climate action.
The tweet's strong political commentary reflects a broader sentiment among some critics regarding the perceived influence of fossil fuel interests on government. While the specific "piece" mentioned in the tweet is not identified, the assertion aligns with documented efforts by the Koch network to shape public discourse and policy on climate change. This ongoing influence continues to be a point of contention in the national debate over environmental regulation and energy policy.