Labour Proposes Mandatory Digital ID, Sparks 'Power Grab' Accusations After Manifesto Omission

London, UK – The Labour government is poised to introduce mandatory digital identity cards for all working adults, a move that has ignited a fierce debate over civil liberties and drawn accusations of a "power grab." The proposals, expected to be formally announced by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, aim to combat illegal migration, tackle rogue landlords, and address exploitative employment practices.

The announcement comes despite the absence of any mention of identity cards or digital ID in Labour's 2024 general election manifesto. Political commentator Matt Goodwin sharply criticized the initiative on social media, stating, > "There is no mention at all of identity cards or digital ID in Labour’s 2024 manifesto. There is absolutely no democratic mandate whatsoever for this latest power grab by a broken state."

The proposed "Brit card" system, which would require new legislation, is envisioned to be integrated with the existing "One Login" government infrastructure. Supporters, including the Tony Blair Institute, argue that a universal digital ID could significantly streamline public services, reduce fraud, and help control borders by making it harder to work or reside in the UK unlawfully. Shabana Mahmood, the Home Secretary, has reportedly expressed long-standing personal support for ID cards.

However, the plans face considerable opposition from privacy advocates and some political figures. Civil liberties campaigners, along with the Liberal Democrats and several Conservative MPs, have voiced strong concerns about data security, potential system failures, and the implications for individual freedoms. Jim Killock, Executive Director of the Open Rights Group, highlighted the scheme's omission from the manifesto and warned of the risks of creating a "digital surveillance infrastructure."

The debate echoes previous attempts to introduce ID cards in the UK, notably by a Labour government in the 2000s, which were ultimately abandoned. Critics emphasize that mandating digital ID represents a significant step that warrants a proper national discussion, rather than being introduced without a clear electoral mandate.