Loomer Praises DNI Gabbard's Consistent Stance on "Islamic Terrorism" Amidst Ongoing Debate

Laura Loomer, a prominent far-right activist, recently lauded Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard for her explicit use of the term "Islamic terrorism," asserting that there is "no need for anyone to say 'radical' anymore because this is what true Islam calls for." Loomer expressed hope that other government officials would adopt similar language, stating, "Hopefully others in our government will also say this was ISLAMIC TERROR." This statement, shared on social media, reignites a long-standing debate within political and intelligence circles regarding the appropriate terminology for religiously motivated acts of terror.

DNI Gabbard has consistently identified "Islamist terrorism" as a significant threat to the United States. In recent interviews, including one with ABC News in November 2025, she stated, "The reality is that Islamist terrorism continues to pose the greatest -- both short- and long-term -- threat to the American people on freedom and Western civilization." Gabbard, a Lieutenant Colonel in the Army Reserve, has often linked her military service to her focus on combating what she terms "Islamist terrorists," a position that has at times drawn criticism and accusations of Islamophobia, which she denies.

Loomer, known for her controversial and often anti-Muslim rhetoric, has a history of making strong statements regarding Islam and terrorism. She has previously described Islam as "a cancer" and a "threat," and has been banned from various social media platforms for what companies deemed hate speech. In October 2025, Loomer agreed that the Muslim Brotherhood should be designated a "foreign terrorist organization," further cementing her public stance on the issue.

The debate over using terms like "Islamic terrorism" or "radical Islamic terrorism" versus "Islamist extremism" or "violent extremism" has been a point of contention for years. Proponents of the former argue it accurately identifies the ideological roots of certain terror groups, while opponents contend it unfairly implicates the entire religion of Islam and can alienate Muslim communities whose cooperation is vital in counter-terrorism efforts. Gabbard's consistent use of the term, now echoed by figures like Loomer, underscores the persistent division on this sensitive linguistic and political issue.