Los Angeles Government Faces Scrutiny Over Spending Priorities, "Single Party" Rule Questioned

Los Angeles, California – A recent social media post by commentator Lisa Cusack has ignited discussion regarding the fiscal priorities and governance of Los Angeles. Cusack asserted that the city's "single Party government isn’t there to provide for the residents, it’s there to take money to pay off staff, unions, and NGOs." This statement, shared on November 20, 2025, reflects a growing sentiment among some residents concerning how public funds are allocated.

While the Los Angeles City Council is officially nonpartisan, it is currently composed of a dominant Democratic majority with one Independent member, and Mayor Karen Bass is also a Democrat. This political landscape has led some critics to characterize the city's governance as effectively single-party. Such a structure, according to critics like Cusack, can lead to a lack of diverse perspectives in budgetary decisions.

The city's budget, which for the 2024-2025 fiscal year totals $13.5 billion, has faced scrutiny regarding its distribution. A significant portion of these funds is allocated to personnel costs, including salaries, benefits, and pensions for city employees. Labor unions, which represent a large segment of the city's workforce, play a substantial role in negotiating these compensation packages.

Recent reports highlight concerns over rising pension liabilities and the impact of collective bargaining agreements on the city's financial health. Additionally, Los Angeles frequently partners with various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to deliver social services, housing initiatives, and environmental programs, which also draw from public funds. Critics argue that the transparency and effectiveness of some of these expenditures warrant closer examination.

The debate over Los Angeles's spending priorities and governmental structure underscores ongoing tensions between public service delivery and fiscal responsibility. As the city navigates complex urban challenges, the allocation of its substantial budget remains a focal point for public discussion and political commentary.