Evan Barker recently voiced apprehension regarding the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) initiative, questioning its impact on the nation's food safety infrastructure, particularly pathogen monitoring. His concern, shared via a tweet directed at Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., highlighted potential risks to vulnerable populations, stating, > "I don’t understand the rationale behind cutting funding for the infrastructure that monitors pathogens in our food. Children, with under developed immune systems, are especially at risk…"
The MAHA initiative, launched in February 2025 under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, aims to address the chronic disease crisis in the U.S. by focusing on factors such as ultra-processed foods, chemical additives, and environmental toxins. Its May 2025 "Assessment Report" detailed these areas as primary drivers of declining health, especially among children, and outlined plans for reforms including phasing out petroleum-based food dyes and overhauling the "Generally Recognized As Safe" (GRAS) standard for food chemicals.
While MAHA's stated goal is to make the American food system "healthier" by targeting these new priorities, the tweet underscores a concern that this re-prioritization might inadvertently affect traditional food safety mechanisms. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is largely responsible for overseeing the safety of most U.S. food, including pathogen detection and outbreak response. However, a March 2024 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report noted that the FDA's food program has historically faced underfunding and challenges in conducting timely inspections and utilizing data effectively.
Secretary Kennedy has previously criticized the FDA, with reports mentioning "indiscriminate" layoffs within the agency's food division. Although official MAHA documents do not explicitly detail cuts to pathogen monitoring, the strong emphasis on chemical safety and processed foods represents a significant reorientation of focus within federal food policy. This shift has led some observers to question whether resources and attention could be diverted from established areas of food safety oversight, despite the administration's commitment to ensuring a healthy, abundant, and affordable food supply.