Manhattan Institute VP Jesse Arm Advocates for Immigration Policy Rooted in National Interest

Jesse Arm, Vice President of External Affairs at the Manhattan Institute, recently articulated a clear stance on U.S. immigration policy, asserting that the American populace holds the right to determine who enters the country based on national interest. In a recent social media post, Arm stated, "> The American people have a right to choose whom to admit and whom to exclude—and they should do so on the basis of promoting the national interest." This statement underscores a perspective advocating for a more selective and strategically aligned approach to immigration.

Arm's background includes extensive experience in political consulting and data analytics, and he previously worked for Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR), a prominent advocate for merit-based immigration reform. At the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank, Arm oversees communications, government relations, and polling, contributing to the institute's research and policy recommendations, which frequently address issues of national security and economic competitiveness. His writings and commentary have appeared in various reputable publications, solidifying his voice in policy discussions.

The concept of "national interest" in U.S. immigration policy often encompasses economic benefits, national security, and cultural assimilation. Discussions around this framework frequently involve proposals to prioritize immigrants who can fill specific labor shortages, contribute to scientific or technological advancements, or enhance national security. Think tanks and policymakers often debate how to best define and implement policies that serve these varied national objectives.

Proponents of national interest-driven immigration, including some at the Niskanen Center and Hudson Institute, suggest reforms such as ending the diversity visa lottery, curtailing family-based migration beyond immediate relatives, and implementing merit-based systems. These approaches aim to align immigration with the country's strategic needs, ensuring that new arrivals contribute directly to the nation's economic and societal well-being. The debate continues regarding the balance between these strategic considerations and humanitarian concerns.