A recent statement by legal scholar Ilya Shapiro has reignited discussions surrounding the rights of private sector employees regarding their online comments and potential disciplinary actions by employers. Shapiro asserted, "You do not have a constitutional right to your private sector job, you do not have the right not to be fired for saying something that your employer doesn't like," as stated in a tweet by The Will Cain Show. This highlights the prevailing legal framework governing employment in the United States.
The core of this issue lies in the "at-will employment" doctrine, which dictates that employers can terminate an employee for almost any reason, or no reason at all, provided it is not an illegal one. This doctrine also allows employees to leave their jobs at any time without cause. While there are exceptions, such as terminations violating public policy, implied contracts, or the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, the First Amendment's protection of free speech generally does not extend to private employment relationships.
Recent events have underscored the real-world implications of this doctrine. A surge of high-profile firings and suspensions have occurred following individuals' comments on social media, particularly in the wake of the Charlie Kirk killing. Employees across various sectors, including media, healthcare, and education, have faced adverse employment actions for posts deemed insensitive, inappropriate, or damaging to their employers' reputations.
Employers often have social media policies in place that extend to employees' off-duty conduct, particularly if such conduct reflects poorly on the company or violates anti-harassment and discrimination policies. Legal experts emphasize that while some states offer protections for off-duty conduct or political speech, these are typically limited and do not safeguard against posts that promote violence or clearly undermine an employer's mission. The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) offers some protections for concerted activities related to working conditions, but its application to individual social media posts remains a nuanced area.
These instances serve as a potent reminder for private sector employees about the potential consequences of their online expressions. The absence of a constitutional right to a private job means that employers retain significant discretion in managing their workforce, extending to speech that could impact the workplace environment or corporate image.