Jeffrey A. Tucker, founder of the Brownstone Institute, has intensified his long-standing criticism of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. In a recent tweet, Tucker provocatively stated, "During the Covid years, it seemed as if the CDC was being run by sadistic Satantists. It turns out that the CDC was actually being run by sadistic Satanists." This extreme language underscores his consistent opposition to public health measures implemented during the crisis.
Tucker, a vocal proponent of libertarian and free-market principles, established the Brownstone Institute in May 2021. The institute, which he describes as "the spiritual child" of the Great Barrington Declaration, publishes articles that frequently criticize COVID-19 lockdowns, question vaccine mandates, and describe masking as "an attack on our communal life," according to MedPage Today. His past critiques include a debunked claim about the CDC planning "nationwide quarantine camps," which was a misinterpretation of a theoretical shielding approach for humanitarian settings.
The CDC's COVID-19 response has indeed faced significant scrutiny and acknowledged shortcomings. An internal review, ordered by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, identified that the agency was too slow to publish data and that its guidance was often "confusing and overwhelming," leading to public confusion. This review, completed in August 2022, aimed to address issues like initial test kit failures and challenges in communicating evolving scientific understanding.
Studies and public opinion polls reflect a decline in public trust in the CDC during the pandemic. Pew Research Center reported in February 2022 that 60% of U.S. adults felt confused by changes in public health recommendations. Critics, including a study published in J Health Polit Policy Law, point to political interference, particularly during the Trump administration, as a factor that "muted" the CDC's ability to respond effectively and communicate clearly.
In response to criticisms, the CDC has initiated reforms under its "Moving Forward" initiative, focusing on faster scientific sharing, enhanced laboratory quality, clearer public health communications, and a stronger workforce for future emergencies. These efforts aim to rebuild trust and improve the agency's agility in responding to novel public health threats. Despite these reforms, figures like Tucker continue to voice profound distrust in the institution's past actions and underlying motivations.