J.D. Haltigan, PhD, a developmental psychologist and vocal critic of certain academic and progressive trends, recently posted on social media, asserting that the "contemporary Left" is engaging in "make-believe drama" under the guise of "saving democracy." Haltigan, known for his commentary on "woke" culture and the state of academia, suggested that those claiming to defend democracy are, in his view, merely "living out their heroic role in their own make-believe drama."
"Just own the fact that you like drama" is the message that should be delivered to the entirety of the contemporary Left. The people claiming they are 'saving democracy' are living out their heroic role in their own make-believe drama. They are theater kids," Haltigan stated in his tweet.
Haltigan's commentary aligns with his broader public discourse, which often critiques what he perceives as ideological shifts within institutions and progressive movements. His background includes academic positions at several universities, and he has recently gained attention for his critical stance on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, including a lawsuit filed against UC Santa Cruz over a required diversity statement for job applicants.
The phrase "saving democracy" has become a prominent narrative in contemporary political discourse, particularly among center-left and progressive groups, often used in response to perceived threats to democratic institutions and norms, such as challenges to election integrity or the rise of authoritarian tendencies. This narrative often frames political engagement as a crucial effort to preserve foundational democratic principles.
Conversely, critics from across the political spectrum have sometimes employed metaphors like "drama" or "theater" to dismiss or belittle the perceived emotional intensity or performative aspects of political activism. Such language aims to delegitimize the sincerity or gravity of political claims, suggesting they are driven by emotional or self-aggrandizing motives rather than genuine concern. This rhetorical approach is not exclusive to one political side, but Haltigan's use specifically targets the "contemporary Left."
Haltigan's tweet contributes to an ongoing debate about the nature of political engagement, the sincerity of stated motivations, and the use of rhetorical framing in public discourse. His perspective reflects a segment of commentary that views certain progressive political actions as overly theatrical or disingenuous, contrasting with the self-perception of many activists who see their efforts as essential for democratic preservation.