Public Affairs Strategist Accuses Democratic Party of "Nazi-Style Eugenics" in Public Policy

Olivia P. Walker, a public affairs strategist and registered Republican, has ignited controversy with a recent social media post alleging that the Democratic Party has "adopted and enshrined Nazi-style eugenics into public policy." The claims, made in a lengthy tweet, assert that this policy is demonstrated through "race classification" and "biomedical science policy" under Democratic administrations.

Historically, eugenics in the United States was a movement from the late 19th to mid-20th century, aiming to "improve" the human population's genetic quality. This movement led to policies such as forced sterilization and immigration restrictions, often targeting marginalized groups. Research indicates that support for eugenic legislation was bipartisan, with both Republican and Democratic legislators and governors championing such laws, alongside significant advocacy from medical professionals.

Walker's tweet directly states, "one political Party has adopted and enshrined Nazi-style eugenics into public policy (race classification, biomedical science policy) when in control of the executive branch. That party, as current public policy demonstrates, is the Democratic Party." She encouraged readers to review official public policies for themselves. However, extensive examination of current Democratic Party platforms, legislative records, and reputable news sources does not yield evidence supporting the implementation or endorsement of "Nazi-style eugenics" or policies akin to historical eugenics.

A graduate of the University of South Florida with a Master of Public Administration, Walker has a background in public affairs research, strategy, and writing, and is a member of the American Association of Political Consultants. While she identifies as a registered Republican for electoral purposes, she notes she does not consider herself a "conservative." In her post, Walker also clarified her understanding of the term "eugenicist," distinguishing between those who study biological heredity concepts and those who assign hierarchical value based on genetic ancestry, vehemently opposing the latter.

Beyond the eugenics claims, Walker also touched upon the importance of "truthful AI," referencing Elon Musk's xAI and Grok, and emphasized the constitutional guarantees against intentional discrimination based on ancestry and sex. Her statement underscores a complex intersection of political commentary, scientific interpretation, and personal identity, sparking considerable debate.