Raymond Ibrahim's "Sword and Scimitar" Review Highlights Fourteen Centuries of Conflict Between Islam and the West

Image for Raymond Ibrahim's "Sword and Scimitar" Review Highlights Fourteen Centuries of Conflict Between Islam and the West

A recent tweet by Katya Sedgwick, shared via @EverymanComm, has drawn attention to a review of Raymond Ibrahim's book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West. The tweet, stating it presents a "Hard truth about the reality of Islam and the West," underscores the book's central thesis regarding the historical relationship between the two civilizations.

Published in 2018, Ibrahim's work argues that Muslim hostility towards the West is not an anomaly but a consistent theme rooted in Islamic history, driven by religious motivations. The book delves into eight pivotal battles, including Yarmuk (636), Constantinople (717), Tours (732), and Vienna (1683), to illustrate what it describes as a continuous, religiously-inspired conflict. It posits that Islamic expansion was consistently fueled by a drive for global submission to Allah.

Raymond Ibrahim, a scholar specializing in the Middle East and Islam and fluent in Arabic, is known for his critical analyses of Islamic history. His previous works include The Al Qaeda Reader and Crucified Again. In Sword and Scimitar, he extensively cites primary sources from both Christian and Muslim perspectives to support his narrative of enduring warfare and the prevalence of practices like slavery in Muslim societies.

The book has received varied reactions since its release. Supporters commend it as an "eye-opening" and "well-researched" account that challenges conventional, often conciliatory, narratives about Islam's past interactions with the West. Conversely, critics have labeled it as biased, polemical, and Islamophobic, arguing that it presents a one-sided view and exaggerates the religious motivations for conflict. Notably, Ibrahim was reportedly uninvited from speaking at the Army War College after pressure from groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), who claimed the book advanced an "inaccurate view of Islam."

The ongoing discussion surrounding Sword and Scimitar reflects broader debates about historical interpretation and the complex relationship between religious doctrine and geopolitical events. Ibrahim's work continues to provoke conversation on how the past informs contemporary perceptions of Islam and the West.