U.S. Representative Ro Khanna (D-CA) recently articulated a strong distinction between American patriotism and support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's actions. In a social media post, Khanna stated:
"I know you are upset that I have criticized Netanyahu's actions. But I have news for you. Loving America does not mean bending the knee to Netanyahu. Actually, it requires the opposite!" This tweet underscores a growing sentiment among some progressive Democrats regarding U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
Khanna, a prominent progressive voice, has consistently navigated a complex position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often drawing criticism from both pro-Israel advocates and some on the left. He supports a two-state solution and emphasizes human rights for both Israelis and Palestinians, advocating for policies that prevent settlement expansion and ensure humanitarian aid. His approach aims to balance U.S.-Israel ties with a commitment to progressive values and addressing Palestinian suffering.
The California Democrat has been a vocal critic of Prime Minister Netanyahu's leadership, particularly concerning the military operations in Gaza and the escalating humanitarian crisis. Khanna recently announced his decision to skip Netanyahu's upcoming address to Congress, stating he would not attend a "one-way lecture" and emphasizing the need for decorum in such protests. He has also voted against additional aid to Israel, framing it as a stance against providing a "blank check" to Netanyahu's government, especially in light of the Rafah offensive and the high civilian death toll.
Khanna's remarks reflect a broader shift within the Democratic Party, where a significant faction, including young voters and progressive lawmakers, is increasingly critical of the Biden administration's "bear-hugging" approach to Netanyahu. He has urged President Biden to take a "new direction" on U.S. policy towards Israel and to set "clear consequences" for Netanyahu's actions, advocating for a permanent ceasefire and a two-state solution. This evolving stance highlights internal party tensions over the conflict and the future of U.S. engagement in the region, with Khanna positioning himself as a leading voice for this progressive viewpoint.