Seinfeld's Reported Cuomo Vote on October 31 Recalls 2001 Bloomberg Upset

Gary Greenberg announced via social media today that comedian Jerry Seinfeld and his wife cast their votes in New York City, stating they had voted for Andrew Cuomo. The tweet, posted on October 31, 2025, urged followers to "Get and vote" and drew a historical comparison to the 2001 mayoral election where Michael Bloomberg achieved an upset victory against Mark Green. This claim has initiated conversations regarding celebrity political influence and historical electoral patterns.

Andrew Cuomo, a former Governor of New York, resigned from his position in August 2021 and has not since held public office. As of late 2025, there are no widespread reports or indications that Cuomo is actively campaigning or running for any political office. His public activities have primarily focused on commentary and legal engagements rather than electoral pursuits, making the tweet's implication of a vote for him notable.

Jerry Seinfeld, a globally recognized comedian, has generally maintained a private stance on political endorsements throughout his career. While many celebrities engage in political discourse, Seinfeld is not widely known for publicly endorsing specific candidates or parties. The assertion by Gary Greenberg regarding Seinfeld's vote for Cuomo has not been independently verified by the comedian or his representatives.

The tweet's reference to the 2001 New York City mayoral election highlights a significant historical event. In that race, Republican candidate Michael Bloomberg secured an unexpected victory over Democratic Public Advocate Mark Green. This outcome, occurring in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, is frequently cited as a notable upset in New York City politics, demonstrating the potential for unforeseen electoral results.

Greenberg's social media post, which explicitly stated, > "@JerrySenfield and his wife voted today in NYC and announced they voted for @andrewcuomo . Get and vote . Bloomberg was down to Mark Green in 2001 with Bloomberg winning in an upset," serves as a commentary on the importance of voter participation. The post combines a contemporary claim about celebrity voting with a historical precedent, aiming to underscore the impact of individual votes and the unpredictable nature of elections.