A recent social media post by user "Sulla" has sparked widespread discussion regarding what the author describes as "The New Morality," highlighting perceived contradictions in societal expectations for young people. The tweet, shared on September 28, 2025, specifically questions the differing age-based permissions and restrictions placed on minors and young adults.
"The New Morality: Sex, tattoos, abortion, HRT, drugs, porn, voting all okay for kids. Dating, marriage, and pregnancy forbidden until age 25 bc her frontal lobe isn’t developed yet you sicko," the tweet stated, encapsulating a sentiment of perceived double standards in modern society.
The post draws a sharp contrast between activities often accessible to minors, such as medical decisions concerning reproductive health, gender-affirming care, and political participation, versus traditional adult milestones like marriage and parenthood, which the tweet suggests are increasingly deferred, sometimes citing brain development. This highlights an ongoing societal tension between youth autonomy and protective measures.
Discussions surrounding the decision-making capacity of young individuals are complex, with legal and ethical frameworks varying globally. While some jurisdictions recognize the "mature minor" doctrine, allowing adolescents to make certain medical decisions based on their understanding, others maintain stricter age-based consent laws. The development of the frontal lobe, responsible for executive functions like impulse control and long-term planning, is often cited as a biological basis for age restrictions, with full maturity typically extending into the mid-20s.
Research indicates a divergence in opinions regarding the age at which individuals are deemed competent for various life choices. Studies on medical consent, for instance, show varied perceptions among minors and parents, with a significant percentage of minors believing they are competent to make health decisions by age 16, while parents often lean towards age 18 or older for more serious interventions. This underscores the nuanced nature of defining maturity across different contexts.
The commentary by "Sulla" taps into broader debates about when society truly considers an individual an adult, capable of full self-determination. The tweet implicitly questions the consistency of applying developmental arguments selectively, suggesting a disconnect between the responsibilities and freedoms afforded to young people in the current social landscape. This ongoing dialogue reflects evolving understandings of youth development and societal roles.