Supreme Court to Rule on Mail-In Ballot Receipt Deadlines, Potential to Reshape Future Elections

Image for Supreme Court to Rule on Mail-In Ballot Receipt Deadlines, Potential to Reshape Future Elections

Washington D.C. – The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a pivotal election law case in its 2025 term, focusing on the critical question of when mail-in ballots must be received to be counted. This development, anticipated to significantly impact future federal elections, has drawn sharp commentary, with figures like Dinesh D'Souza tweeting about a "Supreme Court blockbuster on Voter ID" that could "change elections forever." While D'Souza's tweet broadly references "Voter ID," the specific case before the Court, Watson v. Republican National Committee, addresses the legality of extended ballot receipt deadlines. The case challenges laws in Mississippi and 30 other states, along with the District of Columbia, that permit mail-in ballots to be counted if they arrive within a specified period (typically five business days) after Election Day, provided they were cast by the deadline. The dispute originated in 2024 when the Republican National Committee (RNC) and others contested Mississippi's law, arguing it conflicted with federal statutes that set a singular Election Day for federal offices. A federal judge initially upheld Mississippi's law, reasoning that federal election law aims to prevent multiple election days, not to restrict the window for ballot receipt. However, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this decision, asserting that federal law requires all ballots to be received by Election Day itself. The RNC has supported this interpretation, expressing concerns about potential "chaos and suspicions of impropriety" if thousands of ballots arrive post-Election Day, potentially flipping election results. They argue this practice "deprive[s] the electorate of a clear nationwide deadline." Conversely, Mississippi, supported by a coalition of 19 states and the District of Columbia, urged the Supreme Court to overturn the 5th Circuit's ruling. These states contend that the appellate court's decision is "both wrong and destabilizing," particularly highlighting the risk it poses to the ability of military service members and their families stationed abroad to have their lawfully cast ballots counted. The Supreme Court's decision, expected by late June or early July 2026, will determine the permissible timeframe for counting mail-in ballots nationwide. This ruling could fundamentally alter election administration, influencing voter access, logistical planning for election officials, and the finality of election results across a significant portion of the country.