The Lincoln Project Escalates Criticism of Donald Trump, Citing "Beautiful Secrets" and "Perfect Calls"

Washington D.C. – The Lincoln Project, a prominent anti-Trump political action committee, intensified its ongoing critique of former President Donald Trump on July 19, 2025, through a social media post. The group stated, "We can add “beautiful secrets” to his “perfect calls”," directly referencing past controversies and implying new undisclosed information. This statement underscores the organization's continued mission to oppose Trump and his political movement.

The phrase "perfect calls" is widely recognized as a direct reference to the 2019 Ukraine scandal, where then-President Trump described his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as "perfect." This call became central to the first impeachment inquiry against him. The Lincoln Project frequently invokes such historical events to highlight what it perceives as consistent patterns of behavior.

The addition of "beautiful secrets" appears to be a sarcastic jab, suggesting undisclosed or hidden information that the group believes is detrimental to Trump's public image or political standing. Recent content from The Lincoln Project has alluded to ongoing controversies, including the "Epstein matter," which they claim continues to impact Trump's circle. This phrasing aligns with their strategy of leveraging public skepticism and legal challenges against him.

The Lincoln Project, founded by former Republicans, explicitly states its objective as being "here to stop Trump, break MAGA, and save America." Their communication strategy often involves sharp, pointed critiques delivered through various media channels, aiming to influence public opinion and mobilize opposition. The group continues to focus on what they term "Trumpism" and its perceived threats to democracy.

This latest social media post indicates The Lincoln Project's sustained efforts to keep past and potential future controversies surrounding Donald Trump in the public discourse. The organization's consistent engagement reflects a broader political landscape where figures and groups remain deeply divided and actively campaign against each other in the lead-up to future electoral cycles.