Washington D.C. – President Donald Trump has reportedly begun to remove some of his own appointees in a potential second term, following a period of displacing career government officials and Democratic holdovers. This pattern aligns with the high turnover rates observed during his initial presidency, where loyalty was often prioritized over traditional qualifications.
"After months of pushing out career government officials and Democratic holdovers, President Trump is starting to turn on some of his own picks," stated The Wall Street Journal in a recent social media post. This development suggests a continuation of the administrative approach that characterized his first term.
During his first administration, President Trump's White House experienced unprecedented staff turnover, with the Brookings Institution reporting a 92% turnover rate among his senior "A Team" advisors by January 2021. This rate significantly surpassed that of previous administrations, including those of Reagan and Obama. Experts attributed this to a focus on personal loyalty and frequent internal conflicts.
Recent reports indicate that this trend is re-emerging. Examples cited include the firing of Susan Monarez, the Trump-appointed director for the Centers for Disease Control, just one month after her Senate confirmation, and the swift removal of Internal Revenue Service chief Billy Long. White House officials have defended these actions, asserting the President's prerogative to select personnel aligned with his agenda.
GOP strategist Brad Todd commented on the situation, emphasizing that "The voters pick one person to lead the executive branch and that means that person gets to choose every other person." However, critics, such as Max Stier of the Partnership for Public Service, note that "No administration has seen more chaos in its leadership ranks than the Trump administration other than Trump one."
The ongoing personnel changes underscore President Trump's consistent approach to staffing, where challenges to his worldview often lead to departures. This strategy, while ensuring alignment with the President's vision, has historically led to concerns about administrative stability and the retention of experienced leadership within federal agencies.