
Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson and white nationalist Nick Fuentes engaged in a heated exchange during a recent interview on "The Tucker Carlson Show," where both men accused the other of being a "fed" or federal agent. The mutual accusations highlight an escalating feud between the two figures, drawing attention to the internal dynamics of the far-right media landscape. The interaction, which occurred on October 28, 2025, saw the pair trade barbs regarding their authenticity and allegiances.
The contentious moment arose when Fuentes stated, "Well, it’s the feds, obviously," prompting Carlson to respond, "Well, I thought you were a fed." Fuentes quickly retorted, "I was. And I thought you were a fed." Carlson then clarified, "I’m not a fed. But whatever," as the discussion continued to delve into their past disagreements and perceived attempts to discredit each other.
This latest interaction is part of a broader, months-long public feud between Carlson and Fuentes. Carlson has previously disparaged Fuentes, notably calling him a "weird little gay kid" during a discussion with Candace Owens in August 2025. Fuentes, a self-avowed white nationalist who has stated he was "radicalized on race" by listening to conservative talk radio, has in turn accused Carlson of being the "GOAT of gaslighting" and highlighted Carlson's family ties to intelligence agencies.
Fuentes leads the "America First" movement, often referred to as "Groypers," and has been widely associated with extremist and antisemitic views. His past rhetoric and associations have drawn significant controversy, with the original tweet describing the context of the interaction as "Incels for Hitler sit down for a chat!" reflecting the extreme nature of the ideologies often linked to Fuentes. The term "fed" is frequently used within certain far-right and extremist circles to discredit opponents or suggest they are government informants attempting to undermine their movements.
The public sparring between Carlson and Fuentes underscores the ideological fissures and personal rivalries within conservative and far-right media. Both figures command significant audiences, and their public disagreements offer a glimpse into the ongoing struggle for influence and authenticity among various factions on the political right. The exchange further solidifies the perception of a volatile and often contradictory landscape for these commentators.