San Francisco real estate professional Andrew Jeffery has drawn attention to the significant disparities in property performance within the city's complex rental market, highlighting what he describes as the "best" rent roll he has encountered. This observation comes as a stark contrast to a previous post where he noted the "worst" rent roll, underscoring the extreme variations property owners face under San Francisco's stringent housing regulations.
Jeffery, known for his work in real estate investment and advisory services in the Bay Area, shared his latest finding on social media, stating, > "A little while back, I posted the 'worst' rent roll I had ever seen in San Francisco. Well, here's the best one: [link to content, implying visual evidence]." His commentary points to the critical impact of rent control and market dynamics on a property's financial viability.
A rent roll is a document detailing a property's rental income, including tenant names, lease terms, and current rent rates. In San Francisco, the city's Rent Ordinance, enacted in 1979, significantly shapes these figures by capping annual rent increases for most residential units and providing "just cause" eviction protections. This framework often leads to a wide gap between the rents paid by long-term tenants and current market rates.
The "best" rent roll, in this context, likely refers to a property that has managed to maintain rents closer to market value. This can occur if the property is exempt from rent control (e.g., new construction built after June 13, 1979) or if it has strategically utilized "vacancy decontrol" provisions. Vacancy decontrol allows landlords to reset rents to market rates when a unit becomes vacant, incentivizing turnover. Conversely, a "worst" rent roll would typically feature units with long-term tenants paying significantly below market rates due to years of minimal allowable increases.
Such pronounced differences in rent rolls highlight the ongoing challenges and strategic considerations for property owners and investors in San Francisco. While rent control aims to protect tenants from displacement and ensure affordability, it can inadvertently create disincentives for property maintenance and lead to landlords seeking ways to remove units from the controlled market, often through conversions to condominiums or owner-occupied housing. This dynamic contributes to the city's housing supply issues and influences gentrification patterns, as properties that can command market rates become more attractive for investment and redevelopment.