Court Rules Against Compensation for L.A. Print Shop Owner After Police Destroy Business

Image for Court Rules Against Compensation for L.A. Print Shop Owner After Police Destroy Business

Los Angeles, CA – Carlos Pena, an innocent print shop owner in North Hollywood, was left to bear the financial burden of extensive damage to his business after a police operation aimed at apprehending a criminal. The incident, which saw SWAT teams deploy tear gas and forcibly enter his shop, resulted in the destruction of his livelihood, prompting Pena to question, "Why didn't this guy just shoot me?" as shared by journalist John Stossel on social media.

The ordeal began when a man fleeing police barricaded himself inside Pena's NoHo Printing and Graphic Shop. During the subsequent standoff, police reportedly launched 31 to 32 rounds of tear gas into the premises, smashing doors and creating a large hole in the ceiling. Pena's valuable printing equipment was rendered unusable due to the tear gas contamination, with total damages estimated at $62,000 to $63,000.

Despite the significant losses, Pena has received no compensation from city officials or marshals, who have cited "immunity" for the SWAT team's actions. His attempts to navigate the bureaucratic process for reimbursement proved futile, leaving him in despair over the ruin of his life's work. This situation highlights a broader issue where innocent property owners are often left uncompensated for damage incurred during police operations.

The Institute for Justice (IJ), a non-profit law firm, has taken on Pena's case pro bono, arguing that the lack of compensation is unconstitutional. Jeffrey Redfern, an attorney with IJ, asserts that when police destroy private property for a public purpose, the government should be obligated to pay for the damage, aligning with the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. This legal battle underscores a national pattern, as the Institute for Justice has faced similar challenges, including a lost case in Colorado where a court ruled against compensation for a homeowner whose property was destroyed by police.

The devastating impact on Carlos Pena is profound; he now operates his business out of his garage and has lost most of his clientele. His wife, who had retired, was forced to return to work cleaning houses to help make ends meet. The Institute for Justice continues its fight, seeking to establish a clear precedent that holds government entities accountable for property damage caused during law enforcement actions, ensuring innocent citizens are not left with the bill.