Lee Fang Condemns Identity Politics' Shift from DEI Tribalism to "Ugly Sectarianism"

Investigative journalist Lee Fang recently criticized the evolving landscape of identity politics, asserting that the movement has transitioned from what he perceived as the "bigotry embedded into DEI" to an "ugly sectarianism" that defames entire ethnic groups. In a tweet posted on November 22, 2025, Fang drew a direct parallel between this new form of discourse and the rhetoric often attributed to author Ibram Kendi regarding white people. His commentary highlights a growing concern among some critics about the divisive nature of current identity-based discussions.

Fang's initial opposition to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives stemmed from the belief that they fostered "tribalism" by suggesting "certain racial groups were disproportionately prone to certain behaviors." He argued that this approach led to systemic discrimination against individuals from groups deemed "privileged," thereby undermining a "race neutral meritocracy." Critics of DEI often contend that such programs, despite their stated goals, can inadvertently create division by emphasizing group identity over individual merit and fostering resentment among different demographics.

However, Fang now points to a more concerning development, stating, "Now you embrace ugly sectarianism with crude language that defames entire ethnic groups." This suggests a perceived escalation in rhetoric, moving beyond what he saw as the inherent flaws of DEI to a more direct and aggressive form of group-based denigration. This sentiment resonates with broader criticisms that some identity politics discussions have become overly confrontational and accusatory.

The journalist explicitly likened this "ugly sectarianism" to "the way Ibram Kendi talks about white people," labeling the shift as "shameful and unprincipled." Kendi's work, particularly his concept of "anti-racism," has faced criticism for allegedly promoting "race essentialist thinking" and portraying white individuals as inherently benefiting from systemic white supremacy. This comparison underscores Fang's view that the current discourse risks mirroring the very bigotry it claims to combat, albeit directed at different groups.

Fang's public statement contributes to an ongoing, contentious debate surrounding the efficacy and impact of DEI initiatives and the broader trajectory of identity-focused social movements. His remarks reflect a perspective that views certain aspects of contemporary identity politics as having veered into counterproductive and divisive territory, potentially exacerbating societal fragmentation rather than fostering genuine equity and inclusion.