Scientist Heather Heying Affirms "TWO and ONLY two sexes," Raises Parental Rights Concerns

Evolutionary biologist and author Heather Heying recently voiced strong criticisms of "new gender ideology," asserting the biological reality of "TWO and ONLY two sexes." Her comments, shared by advocacy group Genspect, highlighted a profound concern for parental autonomy, stating,

"The most horrifying thing about the new gender ideology is that I could have had those children taken from me."

Heying, known for her work in evolutionary biology, consistently emphasizes that biological sex in humans and most animals is fundamentally binary, determined by gamete type. She argues that this biological reality, rooted in millions of years of evolution, is distinct from gender roles or identity, which she views as more fluid cultural constructs. Her position contrasts with contemporary discussions that often present gender as entirely separate from biological sex.

The scientist's statement regarding children being "taken from me" underscores a growing debate concerning the role of parents in decisions related to their children's gender identity. This concern often arises in contexts where medical or social transition pathways for minors are promoted, sometimes leading to legal or ethical conflicts between parents, children, and state or medical authorities. Heying suggests that current gender ideology can undermine established parental authority.

Genspect, the organization that amplified Heying's remarks, is an advocacy group focused on promoting evidence-based approaches to gender dysphoria and supporting parents of gender-questioning youth. Their platform frequently critiques what they perceive as an overly affirmative and medicalized approach to gender identity in minors. Heying's views align with a segment of public discourse that calls for caution and a re-emphasis on biological facts in discussions about sex and gender.

The ongoing debate, fueled by figures like Heying, highlights a significant cultural and scientific tension regarding the definitions of sex and gender. Her arguments contribute to a broader conversation about the societal implications of rapidly evolving concepts, particularly concerning children's well-being, parental roles, and the interpretation of biological realities in public policy and education. This discourse continues to shape discussions across various sectors, from healthcare to legal frameworks.