"A Chemical Hunger" Series Marks Four Years, Far Surpassing Initial Projections of "Few Hundred Readers" to Influence Obesity Discourse

Online collective Slime Mold Time Mold announced today, July 8, 2025, the four-year anniversary of its influential "A Chemical Hunger" series. Launched with modest expectations, the comprehensive exploration into the causes of the obesity epidemic has garnered a far wider readership than its anonymous authors ever anticipated. The series, which posits a controversial theory on environmental contaminants, has become a significant talking point in discussions surrounding public health.

The "A Chemical Hunger" series challenges conventional understandings of obesity, arguing that the global rise in weight is primarily driven by environmental contaminants, rather than solely by diet and exercise. The authors, operating under the moniker Slime Mold Time Mold, have systematically presented evidence suggesting that substances like lithium in water or other industrial chemicals may alter the body's weight regulation mechanisms. This perspective has often been met with both keen interest and considerable scientific debate.

In a tweet marking the anniversary, Slime Mold Time Mold stated, > "four years ago today, we posted the first installment of A Chemical Hunger we thought that no one would take it seriously, let alone read it, that the series would maybe get a few hundred readers over the next ten years boy were we wrong." This candid admission highlights the unexpected virality and sustained engagement the series has achieved, reaching far beyond the niche audience initially envisioned. Its detailed, multi-part analysis has spurred extensive online discussion and critical review within various scientific and skeptical communities.

Beyond the "A Chemical Hunger" series, Slime Mold Time Mold has continued to engage in unconventional scientific inquiry and public engagement. They have, for instance, initiated community-led experiments, such as the "potato diet" trial, to further test hypotheses related to weight regulation. This approach underscores their commitment to empirical investigation and open-source scientific exploration, contributing to a broader, often unconventional, dialogue on complex health issues.