A recent social media post by Kaizen D. Asiedu claimed that conservative activist Charlie Kirk "didn't even believe in race," a statement that stands in stark contrast to Kirk's extensive public record of commentary on racial issues. Throughout his career, Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, frequently engaged with and made controversial remarks regarding race, often drawing widespread criticism. His statements consistently addressed race, affirmative action, and the experiences of Black individuals in America.
Kirk often denied the existence of systemic racism and dismissed concepts like white privilege, labeling it a "racist lie." He was a vocal critic of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and critical race theory, arguing they unfairly prioritized race over merit. "If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified," Kirk stated on his show in January 2024, a comment widely interpreted as perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
Further examples of his racially charged rhetoric include questioning the qualifications of prominent Black women, such as Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. He suggested they advanced due to affirmative action, claiming they lacked the "brain processing power" to be taken seriously and had to "steal a white person’s slot." These remarks were described by critics as explicitly racist and reflective of long-standing attacks on Black achievement.
Kirk also stirred controversy by criticizing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., calling him "awful" and "not a good person," and suggesting the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a "huge mistake." He frequently discussed what he termed "the great replacement strategy," asserting it was underway to "replace white rural America with something different." Such statements underscore his consistent engagement with racial themes, albeit from a highly contentious perspective.
The tweet's assertion that Kirk "didn't even believe in race" is directly contradicted by a multitude of his public statements and the consistent focus on race in his commentary and organizational activities. His career was marked by discussions and debates on race, often positioning him as a highly polarizing figure in the national conversation on identity and social justice.