Gavin Newsom Faces Accusations of Inconsistency Over Son's Admiration for Slain Activist Charlie Kirk

California Governor Gavin Newsom is drawing sharp criticism from conservative commentators, including Andrew Kolvet, for allegedly shifting his narrative regarding his son's admiration for the late conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The controversy centers on Newsom's differing statements about his son's interest in Kirk, made before and after Kirk's assassination in September.

Earlier this year, during an interview on his own podcast, "This is Gavin Newsom," the Governor spoke warmly of his then 13-year-old son's enthusiasm for Kirk. Newsom recounted, > "No, Dad. I just What time? What time's Charlie going to be here? What time?" describing his son's eagerness to meet Kirk and even suggesting he wanted to skip school. This initial interaction was part of Newsom's stated effort to engage with figures he disagreed with.

However, following Kirk's tragic assassination at a Utah college campus event in September 2025, Newsom offered a different account during an interview on CNN in late October. When asked about his son's reaction to Kirk's death, Newsom stated, > "He wasn't a fan of him as much as he was familiar with him." This perceived change in recollection has fueled accusations of political expediency.

Conservative figures and media outlets have highlighted the stark contrast between Newsom's two statements. Andrew Kolvet, among others, has publicly criticized the Governor, suggesting Newsom's updated remarks constitute "lying" about his son's true sentiments towards Kirk. Critics argue that the Governor's altered story was an attempt to distance himself from the controversial figure after his death.

Charlie Kirk, co-founder of Turning Point USA, was a prominent and often polarizing voice in conservative youth activism. His assassination prompted widespread condemnation, including from Governor Newsom, who called the shooting "disgusting, vile, and reprehensible." The ongoing debate underscores the scrutiny public figures face regarding their interactions with political opponents, especially in the wake of high-profile events.