The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), an organization that describes itself as a body of experts, is facing significant scrutiny regarding its membership policies, which reportedly require only a form and a fee to join. Recent revelations indicate that the association's roster has included parody accounts, such as "Mo Cookie" and "Emperor Palpatine," raising questions about its academic rigor and the credibility of its pronouncements.
Membership in the IAGS can be obtained for as little as $30 annually, a low barrier to entry that critics contend undermines the organization's claim of representing leading experts in the field. The IAGS website states it is "open to academics as well as civil society practitioners, policymakers, and all sorts of other people who are invested in the research and understanding and the prevention of genocide." However, this broad inclusivity has led to concerns about the expertise and intentions of some members.
The issue gained prominence following the IAGS's recent resolution accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. This resolution, widely reported by media outlets, was presented as a definitive statement from experts. However, reports from HonestReporting and The Times of Israel highlighted that the vote saw only 28% of the estimated 500 members participate, with 120 voting in favor, despite claims of an "overwhelming majority."
Critics argue that the IAGS has been "hijacked by activists" and that its standards have been "lowered," blurring the lines between academic scholarship and political advocacy. Longtime members, such as Sara Brown, have noted that the association's expansion to include non-experts and activists "opened the door" to such institutional capture. Following the controversy, the IAGS reportedly took action by shutting down its public membership page and removing its membership list from public view.
Despite these criticisms, the International Association of Genocide Scholars maintains its mission as a "global, interdisciplinary, non-partisan organization that seeks to further research and teaching about the nature, causes, and consequences of genocide, and advance policy studies on genocide prevention." The ongoing debate over its membership standards and the implications for its pronouncements continues to draw attention to the integrity of academic associations in politically charged contexts.