J.D. Vance's "Elite Sociopathy" Critique Resonates in Conservative Discourse, Targeting "The Bulwark"

A recent social media post by developmental psychologist J.D. Haltigan, PhD, reignited discussion around Senator J.D. Vance's controversial critique of "modern leftism." Haltigan endorsed Vance's assertion that "a substantial amount of modern leftism is elite sociopathy disguised as a political philosophy," specifically citing "The Bulwark" as an example. This commentary highlights ongoing ideological rifts within conservative circles and broader political discourse.

Senator J.D. Vance, a Republican from Ohio, has frequently articulated a worldview critical of what he perceives as a detached, progressive elite. His "elite sociopathy" remarks are consistent with his broader criticisms, often linking childlessness among leaders to a lack of investment in the nation's future and a "less mentally stable" society, as noted in various past statements and interviews. Vance's perspective reflects a populist conservative stance that views certain liberal and establishment figures as out of touch.

The Bulwark, a prominent conservative news and opinion website, was founded in 2018 by "Never Trump" Republicans, including Bill Kristol and Charlie Sykes. It emerged from the remnants of The Weekly Standard, positioning itself as a center-right platform critical of Donald Trump and his influence on the Republican Party. Its editorial stance frequently challenges pro-Trump narratives and what it considers the excesses of the populist right, advocating for traditional conservative principles.

J.D. Haltigan, a developmental psychologist and former assistant professor, has gained attention for his critiques of contemporary academia, particularly what he describes as the ideological capture by "woke" progressive ideals and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Haltigan's academic background and public statements indicate an alignment with those who perceive a significant disconnect between intellectual elites and the concerns of the broader public. His agreement with Vance's statement underscores a shared skepticism towards certain progressive movements and their perceived societal impact.

The tweet and subsequent discussions underscore the deep ideological divides not only between the political left and right but also within the conservative movement itself. While Vance represents a more populist, nationalist wing, The Bulwark embodies a traditional, "Never Trump" conservative viewpoint. Haltigan's commentary reflects a growing segment of intellectual critique directed at what is perceived as an increasingly dogmatic and detached elite, echoing Vance's sentiments about the nature of "modern leftism."