Mehdi Hasan's Past Remarks on Non-Muslims and Homosexuals Resurface Amidst Renewed Scrutiny

Image for Mehdi Hasan's Past Remarks on Non-Muslims and Homosexuals Resurface Amidst Renewed Scrutiny

Journalist and political commentator Mehdi Hasan is once again facing scrutiny over past remarks where he reportedly referred to non-Muslims as "animals and cattle" and drew comparisons between homosexuals and pedophiles. These decade-old statements have resurfaced on social media, prompting renewed discussion about Hasan's views and his subsequent apologies. The comments, made during speeches in his earlier career, have been a recurring point of contention for the prominent media figure.

Recordings from approximately 2009-2012 capture Hasan, then in his 20s, making these controversial statements during religious addresses. In one instance, he reportedly stated, "Once we lose the moral high-ground we are no different from the rest, of the non-Muslims, from the rest of those human beings who live their lives as animals, bending any rule to fulfill any desire." Other clips include him categorizing homosexuality alongside pedophilia and bestiality as behaviors transgressive of Islam.

Hasan has repeatedly addressed and apologized for these remarks, describing them as "dumb offensive ranty stuff" and "stupid sweeping remarks" made without notes. In a 2019 Twitter thread, he stated:

"Like a lot of journos (humans?) I’ve said things years ago that I now deeply regret. Chief among them for me is, more than a decade ago, in my 20s, when I wasn’t a public figure, I gave a bunch of speeches to students on Islam/extremism... I made stupid offensive analogies to animals. Argh. I’m embarrassed to have to write about all this again... I just want to say, I’m sorry."

Despite his apologies, these comments frequently resurface, particularly from critics who question his sincerity or suitability for mainstream media roles. Hasan, who has worked for Al Jazeera, The Intercept, and MSNBC, has acknowledged that these remarks are often used against him by opponents. The ongoing debate highlights the challenges public figures face regarding accountability for past statements, especially those made before achieving widespread recognition.