Mike Solana, a prominent conservative commentator and Chief Marketing Officer at Founders Fund, recently sparked debate with a social media post on November 18, 2025, challenging the notion of a "city of international law" within the United States.

Solana asserted that the U.S. operates under "American law," implying strict domestic legal consequences for actions such as attempting to arrest a foreign head of state. His tweet, > "I believe this is a city of international law" well, it's not. it's a city of american law, and in this country if a lunatic marxist theater kid attempts to arrest a foreign head of state he simply goes to prison. hope this helps," underscored a firm stance on national sovereignty over international legal frameworks. Solana, known for his direct and often provocative commentary through his media company Pirate Wires, frequently engages in discussions at the intersection of technology, politics, and culture. His public persona is characterized by strong opinions and a critical view of what he perceives as "woke" or "leftist" ideologies, often advocating for American exceptionalism and a robust application of domestic law. This latest tweet aligns with his established pattern of challenging prevailing narratives and emphasizing national legal authority. The legal standing of foreign heads of state in the United States is primarily governed by principles of diplomatic immunity, rooted in international law and recognized by U.S. domestic law. Under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and customary international law, heads of state, along with certain high-ranking officials and diplomats, are generally afforded immunity from the jurisdiction of foreign courts. This immunity typically protects them from arrest, detention, and prosecution for acts committed in their official capacity while on foreign soil. The U.S. State Department plays a key role in determining and upholding these immunities, which are crucial for maintaining international relations and ensuring the smooth conduct of diplomacy. The relationship between U.S. domestic law and international law is complex. While the U.S. operates under a dualist system, meaning international treaties generally require incorporation into domestic law to be directly enforceable, the U.S. often adheres to international legal obligations. Treaties ratified by the U.S. become the "supreme Law of the Land" under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause. However, the application of customary international law can be more nuanced, often requiring judicial recognition or legislative action. Solana's "city of international law" phrase appears to be a rhetorical device, contrasting a perceived globalist legal perspective with his emphasis on the supremacy of U.S. national law and its punitive measures for perceived violations. His commentary highlights an ongoing debate about the balance between international legal norms and national sovereignty in contemporary political discourse.