A tweet by Washington Post reporter Josh Dawsey on September 20, 2025, referenced a significant 2020 development where the Pentagon demanded journalists covering the military sign a pledge not to obtain or disclose unauthorized material. This policy, initially reported by The Washington Post on September 18, 2020, quickly ignited a firestorm of criticism from press freedom advocates and journalistic organizations. The controversial requirement mandated reporters acknowledge the illegality of acquiring classified information and commit to not seeking such material.
The policy, which had been in effect for several weeks before its public disclosure, was met with immediate condemnation. Organizations such as the National Press Club and the Society of Professional Journalists voiced strong opposition, arguing that the pledge could exert a "chilling effect" on national security reporting. Critics contended that such a demand could impede journalists' ability to uncover vital information in the public interest, potentially compromising government transparency.
Amid the widespread backlash, the Pentagon swiftly reversed its position. Just one week after the policy became public, on September 25, 2020, the Department of Defense announced a halt to its implementation. Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman confirmed the pause, stating, "We are reviewing the policy and will be engaging with members of the press to address their concerns."
The rapid retraction underscored the intense pressure from media watchdogs and the journalistic community. The incident highlighted the ongoing tension between national security interests and the constitutional protections afforded to a free press. While the Pentagon's initial intent was to reinforce existing laws regarding classified information, the method chosen was widely perceived as an attempt to control the flow of information and restrict journalistic inquiry.