Public Figure Adam Lowisz Condemns Calls for Assassination Amid Rising Concerns Over Domestic Extremism

Adam Lowisz, a prominent social media figure known for his politically engaged commentary, recently issued a strong condemnation of rhetoric celebrating assassinations and advocating for further political violence. In a tweet posted on September 12, 2025, Lowisz stated, > "It is one thing to have a disagreement in opinion, it is another thing to celebrate assassinations and call for more assassinations. Domestic terrorism cannot be tolerated." His statement underscores growing anxieties regarding extreme discourse in the current political climate.

Lowisz, whose social media profiles often feature patriotic and European Union flags, has cultivated a public persona that frequently engages with contemporary political issues. His direct address of "domestic terrorism" reflects a broader national conversation about the increasing prevalence of politically motivated violence and threats.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts committed by individuals or groups to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as political, religious, social, racial, or environmental motivations. Authorities, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI, have noted a significant rise in domestic terrorism incidents and investigations in recent years, with racially- or ethnically-motivated extremism and anti-government/anti-authority ideologies being primary concerns.

Experts and government reports indicate a concerning trend where political rhetoric, particularly online, can contribute to the radicalization of individuals and the normalization of extreme views. The proliferation of such discourse has led to increased threats against public officials and a heightened sense of political polarization. Lowisz's tweet highlights the critical distinction between legitimate political disagreement and the dangerous incitement of violence, aligning with calls from various sectors for leaders and citizens alike to denounce and reject all forms of political extremism.

The firm stance against celebrating assassinations and tolerating domestic terrorism, as articulated by Lowisz, resonates with the urgent need to address the underlying factors contributing to a volatile political environment. The emphasis on non-tolerance for such acts reflects a shared concern about the erosion of civil discourse and the potential for real-world consequences stemming from extreme rhetoric.