Reichlin-Melnick Criticizes Administration for Alleged Disregard of Congressional Inspection Law

Washington D.C. – Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a Senior Fellow at the American Immigration Council, has publicly criticized an unnamed administration for allegedly ignoring a law that mandates congressional access for surprise inspections. In a recent social media post, Reichlin-Melnick stated, "> Except the law which says that you must give all members of Congress access to conduct surprise inspections - that one you've decided you can just ignore." This statement highlights growing concerns over transparency and oversight within federal facilities, particularly those involved in immigration enforcement.

Reichlin-Melnick's comments come amidst broader discussions about immigration enforcement and the conditions within detention facilities. While there isn't one single statute granting unfettered access, congressional oversight is considered an inherent constitutional power, supported by various laws and regulations, including aspects of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Advocacy groups frequently report instances where access to these facilities has been restricted, hindering effective oversight.

The expert's critique aligns with his recent observations on increased immigration enforcement and detention practices. In a July 16, 2025, interview, Reichlin-Melnick detailed concerns about overcrowding in detention centers, inadequate conditions, and the redirection of federal resources towards immigration enforcement. He noted that facilities are sometimes holding individuals in spaces not designed for long-term detention, such as office basements, due to a lack of beds.

The American Immigration Lawyers Association emphasizes the critical role of Members of Congress and their staff in conducting oversight visits, meeting with detained individuals, and investigating conditions to ensure accountability. However, challenges persist, with facilities sometimes citing security or administrative reasons to limit access, thus impeding full transparency.

The call for adherence to laws regarding congressional inspections underscores a broader tension between executive actions and legislative oversight. Reichlin-Melnick's statement suggests a deliberate sidestepping of established protocols, further fueling debates on accountability and human rights within the immigration system.